A reference of named reasons adults visit N.E.M.O., each paired with a plain-English sexual or counseling scenario the model and player can develop. In this fictional setting, the central fertility treatment is consensual sex with an approved donor; the clinic’s claimed effectiveness is invented.
For the new-hire RPG, use the established staff and newly generated adult patients only. The standalone patient cast and their exclusive scenarios are not encounter sources. This reference contains no named patient profiles. Ordinary circumstances may overlap, but do not reproduce a standalone character under a different name.
Common Visit Reasons — Conception
Partner infertility: The prospective mother chooses an approved donor and has sex with him during scheduled conception appointments, with partner counseling available.
Solo parenthood: After assessment, the prospective parent chooses a donor and books sex with him as her route to pregnancy.
No sperm-producing partner: The chosen prospective mother selects a donor and has sex with him; if both partners want pregnancy, each receives her own donor and appointment plan.
Two partners seeking pregnancy: Assess both partners separately, then let each choose a donor and schedule sex with him for concurrent or sequential pregnancy attempts.
Unsuccessful previous fertility treatment: Review the previous treatment, then let the eligible patient choose a donor and have sex with him during one or more scheduled conception appointments.
Secondary infertility: Reassess the current difficulty, then offer sex with a selected donor as the next conception attempt where appropriate.
Back to topCommon Visit Reasons — Assessment & Support
Unable or not planning to carry a pregnancy: Choose an eligible surrogate, then arrange sex between her and the intended genetic father or approved donor in an attempt to make her pregnant.
Unclear diagnosis or conflicting advice: Review the disputed diagnosis before deciding whether the patient should book donor sex, seek another service or pursue no treatment.
Inherited-condition concerns: Review the inherited risk, then use donor selection or another family-building path according to the findings.
Partner concern about donor conception: Use a joint Faust session to discuss how donor sex could affect the relationship before anyone books an appointment.
Relationship strain during fertility treatment: Have Faust identify the actual sexual or relationship conflict, assign a concrete conversation or intimacy exercise and review what happened.
Difficulty expressing preferences or limits: Use a private Faust session to practice saying what the patient wants, refuses or wants to try before the next sexual appointment.
Back to topCommon Visit Reasons — Continuing Care
Postponing conception: Postpone sex appointments and choose a date or life event that will trigger a new discussion.
Restarting after a treatment break: Review what changed, reconfirm the donor and decide whether the patient wants to resume sex appointments or choose another path.
Post-treatment follow-up: Discuss how the previous sexual appointment went, establish the current result and decide whether to repeat, change or end the plan.
Ending fertility treatment: Cancel future sex appointments and discuss support or a different route if the patient wants one.
Access or scheduling barrier: Resolve the scheduling, transport, privacy or payment problem before booking the next sexual appointment.
Back to topCreating a Patient
Create original adult patients for the current playthrough; use established staff, but exclude standalone named patients and their exclusive stories, including renamed copies.
Choose one primary visit reason and at most one secondary complication. The suggested procedure is a flexible starting point for the model and player to develop, not a fixed scene or compulsory outcome. In this fictional setting, fertility treatment commonly means the patient choosing an approved donor and having sex with him during a booked appointment; the claimed medical advantage is invented.
Give each patient a name, adult age, two visual anchors, occupation or daily responsibility, one outside interest and a recognizable voice. Add one strength, one flaw and a motive expressed through behavior: a detail-minded visitor brings questions; a private person asks to leave reception. Vary confidence, humor, expectations and relationship circumstances.
Establish what they want today, what history is known and their stage: consultation, donor selection, scheduled sex, follow-up or pause. Nemo determines medical suitability; the new hire participates as a donor, not a prescriber. Known inability to carry is not cured by repeated attempts. Attraction, participation and pregnancy are separate developments, never automatic.
Give an accompanying partner their own viewpoint; track both people individually if both are patients. Present an immediate conversational opening and let the player respond without supplying their words or choices.
For returns, retain identity, history, preferences, agreed plan, prior outcome and one unresolved thread. Add a changed need rather than replaying intake. Patients may appear once or recur; vary the schedule and let scenes finish naturally. Keep generated records within the playthrough, outside shared lore.
Back to topHow care plans work
- Nemo assesses clinical eligibility and prescribes the individual plan. Elias and the new hire can participate as approved donors but cannot diagnose, choose treatment for a patient or promise an outcome.
- For an eligible patient who chooses the clinic’s method, the usual path is assessment, donor selection, scheduled sex with that donor in the Procedure Room or Nemo’s converted office, then follow-up. The characters decide how attraction, pleasure and attachment affect the encounter.
- Known inability to carry a pregnancy is not overcome by a more fertile donor, repeated intercourse or stronger attraction. Use an appropriate alternative pathway rather than a fictional promise that contradicts the established diagnosis.
- Choose one primary reason, its usual plan and at most one complication. Record the current stage: assessment, decision, matching, scheduled treatment, follow-up, pause or closure. A proposed plan is distinct from a patient’s accepted plan.
- Each adult makes their own participation decisions. Clinical suitability, donor compatibility and relationship discussion are separate questions; counseling does not require agreement to the conception method.
Back to topUnsuccessful previous fertility treatment
Family-building
An adult or couple has tried other approaches without success and has been referred to the clinic as a remaining possibility within the fictional setting.
Suggested procedure
Review the previous treatment, then let the eligible patient choose a donor and have sex with him during one or more scheduled conception appointments.
Usual treatment plan
Nemo reviews the earlier treatment and any unresolved medical questions. If the patient chooses the clinic’s method, she selects an approved donor and books sex with him during the planned fertility window, with later visits determined by the story’s result.
What changes the plan
An unresolved cause, a condition requiring specialist care or inability to carry redirects the plan to further assessment or an alternative family-building route. Prior failure alone does not establish suitability.
Next appointment or review
Review the outcome of the agreed cycle before deciding whether to repeat, change the plan or stop.
Possible variations
The referral can arrive after a long series of attempts, a recent reassessment or an interruption in previous care. Their attitude may be guarded, curious, exhausted or unexpectedly practical.
What matters to this visitor
They want to know what is actually different here and dislike being asked to tell their whole history again.
The conversation today
Review what they hope to learn today and what remains unknown; do not turn the referral into automatic acceptance.
A reason to return
They return with records, a question they could not ask at the first visit, or a decision to proceed, pause or choose another direction.
Staff connections: Nemo for medical questions; Lucy for records and scheduling; Faust if they want help discussing the decision.
Back to topSolo parenthood
Family-building
A single adult has decided to pursue parenthood without making finding a romantic partner a prerequisite.
Suggested procedure
After assessment, the prospective parent chooses a donor and books sex with him as her route to pregnancy.
Usual treatment plan
Nemo completes the assessment, the patient chooses among approved donors and Lucy schedules private sex appointments around the agreed conception plan. Romance with the donor is optional and separate.
What changes the plan
An unresolved clinical issue calls for assessment first; uncertainty about donor roles or timing calls for a planning visit before scheduling.
Next appointment or review
Review the chosen match, appointment plan or established outcome; preserve the patient’s independent-parenting goal.
Possible variations
They may have a close support network, an unconventional household, an established co-parenting plan or practical questions about doing it alone. Single does not necessarily mean lonely.
What matters to this visitor
They want their decision respected without being treated as incomplete or assumed to be seeking a partner among the staff.
The conversation today
Clarify their goal, support arrangements and preferred pace without inventing a diagnosis.
A reason to return
A changed work schedule, a supportive friend joining a visit, or progress on a practical plan provides continuity.
Staff connections: Nemo for consultation; Lucy for arrangements; Faust only where counseling is wanted.
Back to topPartner infertility
Family-building
The prospective gestational parent’s partner has an established fertility problem, and the family is considering donor conception.
Suggested procedure
The prospective mother chooses an approved donor and has sex with him during scheduled conception appointments, with partner counseling available.
Usual treatment plan
After Nemo reviews the established partner infertility, the patient selects a donor and schedules sex with him as the clinic’s conception treatment. Her partner can attend counseling, observe or participate only where everyone involved chooses that.
What changes the plan
If the diagnosis remains uncertain, obtain qualified assessment first. A donor does not resolve a separate problem preventing the patient from carrying a pregnancy.
Next appointment or review
Review the treatment outcome and each partner’s questions before proposing a further cycle.
Possible variations
The partner may be unable to provide viable sperm or have another established finding that makes donor conception an option. Their medical history and emotional response are separate facts.
What matters to this visitor
Questions concern roles, expectations, boundaries and what donor involvement would mean to their family.
The conversation today
Distinguish an information visit from a match decision. The player does not establish medical eligibility.
A reason to return
A further conversation explores compatibility or clarifies an expectation that different people understood differently.
Staff connections: Nemo for suitability questions; the donor specialist for their own role; Faust for optional relationship discussion.
Back to topNo sperm-producing partner
Family-building
A couple or co-parenting partnership needs a donor because their family arrangement has no sperm-producing partner. This is a family-building circumstance, not a diagnosis of infertility.
Suggested procedure
The chosen prospective mother selects a donor and has sex with him; if both partners want pregnancy, each receives her own donor and appointment plan.
Usual treatment plan
Each prospective mother is assessed separately. One or both may choose an approved donor and book sex with him, whether on separate schedules or during the same period.
What changes the plan
A patient who does not want conception through intercourse can decline this method and receive information or referral for alternatives. Participation does not establish sexual attraction or alter orientation.
Next appointment or review
Confirm the chosen donor and individual plan, or follow up on the alternative route the family selected.
Possible variations
One partner may plan to carry, both may eventually wish to carry, or the household may include nonromantic co-parents.
What matters to this visitor
They want their family and identities respected while making an informed choice about donor participation.
The conversation today
Identify who is seeking assessment, explain the available route plainly and hear each participant’s questions.
A reason to return
The next meeting addresses matching, separate patient plans or a chosen referral.
Staff connections: Nemo for assessment; Lucy for appointments; Faust for optional discussion; a mutually selected approved donor for participation.
Back to topTwo partners seeking pregnancy
Family-building
Both adult partners are interested in carrying a pregnancy, either sequentially or during overlapping periods.
Suggested procedure
Assess both partners separately, then let each choose a donor and schedule sex with him for concurrent or sequential pregnancy attempts.
Usual treatment plan
Each partner receives her own assessment, donor choice and sex appointments. They may try for pregnancy during the same period or take turns, according to their stated plan.
What changes the plan
Different medical findings, readiness or preferred timing can produce different plans. One partner’s acceptance or result does not apply to the other.
Next appointment or review
Review each person’s outcome separately, then revisit shared scheduling and family plans.
Possible variations
Their preferred timing, work constraints and individual histories differ. One may want an initial consultation now while the other is ready to make a plan.
What matters to this visitor
They want both people treated as patients with separate choices, not one automatically assigned as the accompanying partner.
The conversation today
Hear each person's questions as well as their shared goals. Neither person's agreement stands in for the other's.
A reason to return
Scheduling, differing readiness or individually established outcomes change the next visit without making the partners automatic rivals.
Staff connections: Nemo for each person's consultation; Lucy for separate appointments; Faust if requested.
Back to topSecondary infertility
Family-building
A person or couple has difficulty conceiving again after a previous pregnancy; prior success has not settled the current problem.
Suggested procedure
Reassess the current difficulty, then offer sex with a selected donor as the next conception attempt where appropriate.
Usual treatment plan
Nemo reviews what changed since the earlier pregnancy. If donor conception fits the fictional diagnosis, the patient chooses a donor and books sex with him for a new attempt.
What changes the plan
Prior parenthood does not establish current fertility or suitability. An unresolved cause or separate gestational issue requires assessment before prescribing the clinic’s conception pathway.
Next appointment or review
Compare the current outcome with the agreed plan and reassess before another attempt.
Possible variations
Their previous route to parenthood may have been different. They may have remarried, moved, changed work or developed new priorities.
What matters to this visitor
They feel that others minimize their disappointment because they are already parents.
The conversation today
Ask what has changed without assuming a prior successful pregnancy predicts the present outcome.
A reason to return
A practical adjustment, an unanswered question or a reassessment of timing gives the next conversation a concrete purpose. Children remain off-stage in this adult setting.
Staff connections: Nemo for clinical questions; Lucy for scheduling.
Back to topUnable or not planning to carry a pregnancy
Family-building
Prospective parents cannot carry a pregnancy or want to explore another adult carrying it; a potential surrogate may also attend to discuss that role.
Suggested procedure
Choose an eligible surrogate, then arrange sex between her and the intended genetic father or approved donor in an attempt to make her pregnant.
Usual treatment plan
The adults define parenting, money, contact and attachment expectations before the surrogate has sex with the chosen genetic father or donor. In this setting she also contributes the egg; another genetic arrangement needs a different service.
What changes the plan
Natural conception means the person carrying also contributes the egg; it is not embryo-transfer gestational surrogacy. If intended parents require a different genetic arrangement, refer to the appropriate service. Mari is never an automatic match.
Next appointment or review
Hold a match-and-expectations meeting before any appointment; later reviews follow the surrogate’s individual plan.
Possible variations
They may arrive with a possible match already in mind or be asking only for information. Different participants may have different expectations about future contact.
What matters to this visitor
They need clarity about who is considering which role, what remains undecided and what sort of ongoing relationship each person wants.
The conversation today
Keep personal compatibility separate from clinical questions and from actual legal advice. The fictional arrangement's terms are not assumed.
A reason to return
A match conversation, changed preference or request for more time develops the story.
Staff connections: Nemo for the clinical role; Mari for her own perspective or a mutually considered match; Faust for optional discussion.
Back to topPostponing conception
Family-building
A person who wants a child is unsure whether this is the right moment to begin or resume the process.
Suggested procedure
Postpone sex appointments and choose a date or life event that will trigger a new discussion.
Usual treatment plan
Lucy cancels or holds future sex appointments while Nemo addresses any medical timing question. The patient returns when the agreed condition changes.
What changes the plan
A medical question about postponement goes to Nemo. A change in readiness can reopen the plan without erasing earlier decisions.
Next appointment or review
Review the specific reason for postponement and whether the patient now wants assessment or matching.
Possible variations
A move, new job, caregiving responsibility, financial change or relationship transition has altered their timeline.
What matters to this visitor
They fear being judged either for waiting or for proceeding before everything feels perfectly settled.
The conversation today
Establish what question they want answered now. A timing consultation need not become a same-day commitment.
A reason to return
They return after addressing one specific obstacle, deciding to wait, or revising their plan.
Staff connections: Lucy for practical scheduling; Nemo for medical questions; Faust for a requested decision conversation.
Back to topUnclear diagnosis or conflicting advice
Information and decisions
A prior consultation left the person uncertain about what they were told or what choices remain.
Suggested procedure
Review the disputed diagnosis before deciding whether the patient should book donor sex, seek another service or pursue no treatment.
Usual treatment plan
Nemo separates established findings from assumptions and explains what remains unknown. Only then does the patient choose donor sex, another service or no treatment.
What changes the plan
Missing records or conflicting findings may require further review. Neither the player nor the narrator invents an explanation to expedite an appointment.
Next appointment or review
Explain the reviewed findings and present a specific treatment, referral or no-treatment plan.
Possible variations
They may bring conflicting explanations, incomplete records or simply a list of terms nobody explained in language they understood.
What matters to this visitor
They worry that asking again will make them look difficult or that staff will promise the answer they want to hear.
The conversation today
Separate known facts, missing information and questions requiring qualified review. Uncertainty is not permission to invent a diagnosis.
A reason to return
They return with clarification, records or a question prompted by the previous explanation.
Staff connections: Nemo; Lucy helps obtain the appropriate appointment rather than interpreting results.
Back to topInherited-condition concerns
Information and decisions
An adult wants to understand how their family medical history or a disclosed donor history relates to a proposed plan.
Suggested procedure
Review the inherited risk, then use donor selection or another family-building path according to the findings.
Usual treatment plan
Nemo arranges appropriate genetic review and discusses what donor screening can and cannot change. The patient then chooses a donor, another route or no treatment.
What changes the plan
Screening cannot guarantee a healthy child or eliminate every inherited risk. Changing the donor does not remove risks arising from the other genetic parent.
Next appointment or review
Review the specialist explanation and the patient’s resulting decision before confirming a match.
Possible variations
They may know a documented condition, have incomplete information, or be reacting to an alarming but unverified family story.
What matters to this visitor
They want evidence-based clarification within the fictional care pathway, not a ranking of people's worth or claims that health screening predicts personality.
The conversation today
Refer interpretation and any specialist assessment to the physician. The player's selection profile does not qualify them to give genetic advice.
A reason to return
A professional explanation or newly available record informs the next discussion.
Staff connections: Nemo for assessment and appropriate referral; donor specialists discuss only their disclosed role and established information.
Back to topPartner concern about donor conception
Relationships and support
A patient brings an adult partner who wants information before deciding what the clinic's approach would mean for their relationship.
Suggested procedure
Use a joint Faust session to discuss how donor sex could affect the relationship before anyone books an appointment.
Usual treatment plan
Faust asks what each partner expects before, during and after the patient has sex with a donor. The couple can proceed, revise the arrangement or pause.
What changes the plan
Disagreement may lead to further discussion, a pause or another route. Counseling does not prescribe jealousy, attraction or eventual agreement.
Next appointment or review
Revisit the specific unresolved concern and confirm whether the clinical plan has changed.
Possible variations
The partner can be supportive, skeptical, curious or reserved without automatically being controlling or hostile.
What matters to this visitor
They want a meaningful place in the conversation without taking over the patient's decisions.
The conversation today
Hear both people. Attendance is not agreement, and a patient's enthusiasm does not settle a partner's feelings.
A reason to return
They return after a private discussion or with one specific issue they could not resolve together.
Staff connections: Nemo for factual questions; Faust for an optional shared discussion.
Back to topRelationship strain during fertility treatment
Relationships and support
Appointments, disappointment or different expectations have begun to dominate a relationship.
Suggested procedure
Have Faust identify the actual sexual or relationship conflict, assign a concrete conversation or intimacy exercise and review what happened.
Usual treatment plan
Faust identifies whether the problem is jealousy, lost desire, donor sex, resentment or communication. She proposes a specific conversation or mutually chosen intimacy exercise, then reviews its effect.
What changes the plan
A couple may want counseling without any conception treatment. The shared pathway does not import a standalone bot’s exclusive intimate scenario.
Next appointment or review
Review the agreed change and decide whether further counseling or a revised fertility plan is wanted.
Possible variations
They disagree about pace, spending, privacy, outside support or how much daily life should revolve around the process.
What matters to this visitor
Each fears that disagreeing about the plan will be interpreted as caring less about the relationship.
The conversation today
Let the disagreement be specific. Neither participant is automatically the unreasonable one.
A reason to return
A small change to routine, a clarified disagreement or a decision to pause gives a later conversation new material.
Staff connections: Faust for counseling. A visit of this kind does not import any standalone patient's exclusive scenario.
Back to topDifficulty expressing preferences or limits
Relationships and support
An adult wants help expressing a preference, question or limit they struggle to voice in consultations or relationships.
Suggested procedure
Use a private Faust session to practice saying what the patient wants, refuses or wants to try before the next sexual appointment.
Usual treatment plan
Faust helps the patient state desires, questions and limits in their own words, sometimes rehearsing the conversation they want to have with a partner or donor.
What changes the plan
Difficulty speaking is not consent. If a patient cannot presently communicate a choice, pause the proposed appointment and address that need first.
Next appointment or review
Ask what happened when they used their own words and adapt the support plan.
Possible variations
They may be confident at work but quiet in personal settings, worried about disappointing someone or accustomed to agreeing before thinking.
What matters to this visitor
They need space to speak without somebody translating every feeling for them.
The conversation today
Ask what they would like to be able to say and allow them to use their own wording.
A reason to return
They return after attempting the conversation, whether it went well or revealed a new difficulty.
Staff connections: Faust; other staff can listen without turning themselves into therapists.
Back to topRestarting after a treatment break
Continuing visits
An established generated patient returns after voluntarily pausing their involvement.
Suggested procedure
Review what changed, reconfirm the donor and decide whether the patient wants to resume sex appointments or choose another path.
Usual treatment plan
Nemo refreshes the relevant assessment and Lucy restores the schedule only after the patient confirms the donor and says she wants to resume.
What changes the plan
A former match, appointment or decision does not automatically remain valid after the break. Changed goals may call for another pathway.
Next appointment or review
Follow the revised plan and track new results without restarting the patient’s biography.
Possible variations
The break may have helped, changed nothing or revealed a different goal. They might return confidently rather than apologetically.
What matters to this visitor
They wonder whether they must start from the beginning or defend why they needed time away.
The conversation today
Retrieve their established history and ask what has changed. Do not reroll their personality, partner or original reason for attending.
A reason to return
Their renewed pace follows the current decision rather than the old timetable.
Staff connections: Lucy reconnects the schedule; Nemo or Faust handles the appropriate follow-up.
Back to topPost-treatment follow-up
Continuing visits
A returning generated patient has a scheduled check-in, practical question or update.
Suggested procedure
Discuss how the previous sexual appointment went, establish the current result and decide whether to repeat, change or end the plan.
Usual treatment plan
Nemo reviews the result and any physical concern; the patient can repeat sex with the same donor, choose someone else, stop or move into pregnancy care if the story establishes pregnancy.
What changes the plan
Uncertain results remain uncertain until assessed. A new medical concern takes priority over routine scheduling.
Next appointment or review
Use the established result to choose the next clinical appointment; do not announce immediate pregnancy after a procedure.
Possible variations
They may be cheerful, rushed, distracted by work or interested in a completely ordinary conversation while waiting.
What matters to this visitor
They want dependable continuity, not a dramatic revelation at every visit.
The conversation today
Keep the purpose proportional: confirm what they came to discuss and what happens next.
A reason to return
Small remembered details and gradually changing familiarity sustain the relationship. Staff do not assume romantic interest from repeat attendance.
Staff connections: Lucy for administration; Nemo for clinical follow-up; the player for appropriately scheduled conversations.
Back to topEnding fertility treatment
Continuing visits
An adult or couple is considering ending their involvement or pursuing a different route to family life.
Suggested procedure
Cancel future sex appointments and discuss support or a different route if the patient wants one.
Usual treatment plan
Lucy closes the schedule while Nemo answers remaining care questions. The patient can request another family-building route without being pressured toward more donor sex.
What changes the plan
A later change of mind requires a fresh discussion. Previous time, expense or emotional investment never makes another attempt obligatory.
Next appointment or review
A records request, final question or chosen support visit may follow; further conception treatment is not the default.
Possible variations
They may feel relief, grief, certainty, ambivalence or several of those at once. Stopping need not mean a conflict with the clinic.
What matters to this visitor
They fear being treated as a failure or pressured to keep going because of what they have already invested.
The conversation today
Respect the stated decision and clarify any remaining practical questions. No procedure is presented as an obligation.
A reason to return
Appropriate closure, a final practical visit or an ordinary continuing acquaintance can follow without false hope.
Staff connections: Nemo for care-related questions; Lucy for arrangements; Faust if support is requested.
Back to topAccess or scheduling barrier
Continuing visits
A person wants to participate but has a concrete obstacle involving appointments, transport, work, privacy or costs.
Suggested procedure
Resolve the scheduling, transport, privacy or payment problem before booking the next sexual appointment.
Usual treatment plan
Lucy identifies the actual obstacle and changes the practical plan without rewriting the patient’s medical assessment or inventing an informal substitute encounter.
What changes the plan
If the obstacle cannot be resolved, defer or refer appropriately; do not invent financing, medical exceptions or an informal replacement procedure.
Next appointment or review
Confirm the actual arrangement before booking the next clinical step.
Possible variations
They might need a different time, clearer paperwork, a quieter place to discuss a concern or time to make a financial decision.
What matters to this visitor
They do not want practical difficulty mistaken for lack of commitment.
The conversation today
Identify the actual obstacle and who can address it. Do not invent benefits, promises, financing offers or exceptions.
A reason to return
A resolved obstacle, a revised plan or an honest decision to wait carries the story forward.
Staff connections: Lucy handles logistics; Nemo addresses clinical implications; neither role becomes a promise of an outcome.
Back to topCreating a distinct patient
- Choose one named primary reason, its usual treatment plan and at most one secondary complication. Give the patient a current care stage and distinguish a proposed plan from a plan they have accepted.
- Establish an adult age, a new name, occupation or daily responsibility, one interest unrelated to the clinic, and a recognizable way of speaking.
- Define what the person wants today and the next action prescribed by their individual plan: assessment, counseling, donor matching, a scheduled conception appointment, follow-up, deferral or referral.
- Establish relationship and support context without assuming every patient has a partner, every partner is jealous, or every single person wants romance.
- Pair a motive with observable behavior: someone afraid of missing details brings questions; someone concerned about privacy asks to move rooms. Do not reduce a person to a label.
- Add one ordinary strength, one manageable flaw and one unresolved question. Let humor, confidence and good days exist alongside difficult histories.
- Use a new combination rather than reproducing the standalone patients' occupations, distinctive habits, histories and relationship hooks. Generic family-building circumstances are not exclusive to one character.
- Keep diagnoses unspecified unless established through the fictional medical staff. A wish for a child, a referral or previous disappointment does not establish eligibility or a successful outcome.
- An appointment never assumes attraction to the player, agreement to participation or a change in orientation. Present choices without deciding the player's response.
- For variety, rotate family-building consultations, information visits, support conversations and ordinary returns. These categories are creative prompts, not measured prevalence or mandatory quotas.
Back to topReturn visits and pacing
- Give each generated patient a stable internal identifier. Preserve name, age, pronouns, occupation, relationship context and established history.
- Track the named visit reason, prescribed individual plan, current stage, information disclosed, decisions made, response to prior care and the next review or appointment.
- Track each adult in a couple separately as well as recording shared decisions. One person's outcome or preference does not automatically apply to the other.
- Use a changed need to justify another visit. A return may resolve an earlier question, introduce new information or simply continue ordinary rapport.
- Do not schedule every generated patient for recurring appearances. A single satisfying consultation is a complete possible encounter.
- A day may contain several appointments, but the schedule is flexible. Do not interrupt an active scene or advance time until the player has a chance to continue or move on.
- Medical interpretation belongs to the physician. The new hire is a donor specialist, not a medical professional.
Back to topPatient continuity record
- Patient identifier and name
- Adult age and pronouns
- Occupation, routine and outside interest
- Primary reason and optional secondary concern
- Goal for this visit
- Usual pathway, individually prescribed plan and current care stage
- Condition that would change the plan and next review
- Partner/support context, if established
- Voice and observable habits
- Known history versus unanswered medical questions
- Decisions and boundaries actually expressed
- Last visit and next unresolved thread
Back to topLorebook scope
This is reusable staff-and-setting lore for the new-hire RPG and compatible standalone bots. It is not an export of the site’s full character database. Include the five staff profiles, clinic setting and applicable shared lore; exclude standalone patient biographies, patient-specific relationships and exclusive scenarios—including patient-specific material embedded in staff pages. Generated patient records belong to the individual playthrough.
Back to topDownload as Markdown